Stewart
Regan has proclaimed a “new dawn” for Scottish Football after an
agreement on a proposed merger was reached this week by clubs
representing the Scottish Premier League and the Scottish Football
League. The merger will the see the restructure of Scottish Football to
adopt a 12-12-18 format and will also see the introduction of a pyramid
system allowing junior sides entry to the senior leagues. This
restructure could well be in place for the start of the 2013-2014
season.
There is no doubt that the agreement between the SPL and the SFL is a massive step forward for Scottish football, where the fans have been crying out for change for some time. However, although fans can be encouraged by the progress being made on a reconstruction, the system to be adopted seems to fly in the face of the view held by the majority of fans. Fans have been crying out for an expansion to the top flight from 12 teams to 16 or even 18. In a recent fans survey on the reconstruction of the Scottish game, conducted by the Daily Record, just 16% of fans were in favour of a 12 team top flight backed up with a 12 team second tier. In contrast, over 50% of those surveyed were in favour of a 16 team top flight. A 16 team top flight was also originally proposed by the SFL, with their 16-10-16 approach. This proposal seems to have fallen away though, with the SFL now seemingly backing the SPL’s proposals.
In
reality, the reconstruction of the league system in Scotland is a
delicate balancing act. The precarious financial position of the game
dictates that any adopted restructure must deliver an appropriate number
of fixtures for each club. Currently, in the top flight, each club
plays 38 games with a guaranteed minimum of 18 home games a season. The
main argument against a 16 team top league is that it reduces the number
of fixtures to 30 a season with only 15 home games. Fans argue that the
financial impact of losing 3 home games a season would be offset by an
increase in the average crowd due to a reinvigorated league. However,
any adopted restructure should also be exciting enough reignite the fans
passion for the game and positively impact attendances and interest in
Scottish football. After all, any business out there knows it would be
suicidal to ignore their customers. So the powers that be face a
difficult balancing act between the wishes of their customer and what
they believe to be financially viable.
The
12-12-18 system that looks likely to be introduced aims to do just
that, and it certainly does meet a portion of the required criteria. The
number of home games for those in the top 2 divisions remains a
guarenteed 18, ensuring no negative financial impact due to reduction in
games. It also has plans to add an an element of excitement when the
split kicks in. The top 8 in the top flight will form the ‘Super 8’ and
challenge for the title. The bottom 4 from top flight join the top 4
from the second flight to form the ‘Playoff 8’ that will decide the
Promotion to and Relegation from the top flight and the bottom 8 of the
second tier form a ‘National 8’ that battle it out to avoid relegation
to the bottom tier. Speaking about the proposed split Stewart Regan says
“every single game is important and we all know what play-offs can do
for attendances, for commercial partners, and broadcast partners.“ The
potential for 4 clubs to gain promotion to the top flight makes entry to
Scotland’s elite league more open than ever before and will potentially
invigorate clubs in the current Scottish First Division. And of course
the introduction of a pyramid structure, allowing junior teams to make
the leap into the senior ranks is something that’s long overdue and is
certainly a huge step forward for the lower levels of Scottish football.
These
are all positive points for the 12-12-18 structure. The trouble is,
some of these perceived positives are merely theoretical and in no way
guaranteed. A more cynical eye cast over the 12-12-18 structure would
realise that although 4 promotion places are up for grabs, it is equally
as likely that all top flight clubs retain their position for the
following season. This is a perfectly plausible possibility. Clubs in
the top flight will spend the summer preparing a squad capable of
playing top flight football, where as clubs in the lower division will
more than likely have a reduced budget and therefore a squad capable of
playing second tier football. A disparity in quality or even in squad
depth may be evident when these clubs meet in the play-off 8. Let’s not
forget these ‘play-offs’ are not one off games, but 14 game
mini-seasons. Some would argue that the jump between top and second
flight football in Scotland is not so severe and, in fact, may not exist
at all. However, a reference could be drawn to Dundee this season. It
may be possible that one reason they are so far adrift this season is
that it wasn’t until mid July that the club was promoted to the SPL, not
giving them adequate time to prepare for a season in the top flight.
That is merely conjecture though. The point is that a system that has
potential to make the top flight more open than before also has the
potential to make it as inaccessible as ever.
You
could argue that there is a far greater financial impact from missing
out on the top 8 in the top flight. It would mean missing out on a home
game with the top clubs. As the league currently stands at the time of
writing that would include missing out on a home game with Celtic,
Aberdeen, Hibs and Dundee Utd. The largest away followings in the
league.
Returning
to that quote from Stewart Regan regarding “every single game is
important”. This is simply not true. With no disrespect intended to the
other 11 current SPL clubs, the league is a one horse race. It’s likely
that after 22 games Celtic will have the league title all but sewn up,
leaving a 14 game procession to the title. Don’t get me wrong, over the
course of a season, in any league structure, Celtic would currently come
out on top every time and of course this is not Formula 1, the point of
the reconstruction is not to try and pin back Celtic to force a more
competitive title race, I just despair that the top 8 is being sold as
“8 teams challenging for the title” when in fact it’s anything but. Neil
Doncaster states “What the model ensures is vibrancy and excitement at
all stages of the season for clubs at all levels.“ I think even he must
realise he is stretching the truth a bit there. The current league split
in the SPL is no different, there is always a danger that a team is
left in the bottom 6 with no real threat of relegation or a team in the
top 6 with no shot at the title or even a European place perhaps. The
difference there is that the league split only occupies 5 league games
at the close of the season. Introducing a split after only 22 games has
potential for some teams seasons to start winding down a lot earlier
than expected and possibly resulting in a drop in attendances.
There
are also suggestions the league may strangle any sort of positive thinking or experimentation. I’m speaking here about clubs
experimenting with good attacking football and introduction some of
their young talent to the team. In a league where one third of the teams
could be relegated there may be a mentality amongst clubs that there is
little room for error. In it’s worst form this could lead to negative,
win-at-all-costs football and a reluctance to blood young talent. This
would hinder the quality of the league and also the progression of young
Scottish players.
Aside from the negative points regarding the system itself, I also have to pick up on Jim Traynor’s point regarding Sporting Integrity. Say what you like about some of the points Traynor made in his communication published on the Rangers website, but he makes a valid point about the timing of the introduction of this system and it’s impact on Sporting Integrity. By trying to have the new system in place for the start of next season, those in charge are effectively moving the goalposts smack bang in the middle of a game. Clubs chasing promotion and play-off places may now find that their endeavors have been meaningless. Playoffs between the 3rd and 2nd Division would surely be cancelled as both teams would occupy the bottom, 18 team league, next season regardless. It is a move that openly mocks any sporting integrity and is an insult to clubs currently competing in the SFL. Regardless, the financial incentives offered to these SFL clubs will more than likely force their hand and see them sign up for the SPL’s proposals.
Aside from the negative points regarding the system itself, I also have to pick up on Jim Traynor’s point regarding Sporting Integrity. Say what you like about some of the points Traynor made in his communication published on the Rangers website, but he makes a valid point about the timing of the introduction of this system and it’s impact on Sporting Integrity. By trying to have the new system in place for the start of next season, those in charge are effectively moving the goalposts smack bang in the middle of a game. Clubs chasing promotion and play-off places may now find that their endeavors have been meaningless. Playoffs between the 3rd and 2nd Division would surely be cancelled as both teams would occupy the bottom, 18 team league, next season regardless. It is a move that openly mocks any sporting integrity and is an insult to clubs currently competing in the SFL. Regardless, the financial incentives offered to these SFL clubs will more than likely force their hand and see them sign up for the SPL’s proposals.
Scottish football is in dire need of change, and it is heading straight
for it. Stewart Regan has hailed it as a ”new dawn”, he may be right,
but it’s not yet clear whether this new dawn will bring with it a red
sky.
What are your thoughts on the proposed changes?
What are your thoughts on the proposed changes?
Not gonna fill up your comments with my full blog
ReplyDeletehttp://stirlingsheepsview.blogspot.com/2013/01/league-reconstruction.html